Hello Guest, Welcome to Apnea Board !
As a guest, you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use.
To post a message, you must create a free account using a valid email address.

or Create an Account


New Posts   Today's Posts

Bilevel vs. Autoset
#1
Bilevel vs. Autoset
I've noticed that many folks on here use a bilevel device. How do you know if you need, or would benefit from using one?

My device is self-setting, adjusting pressure based on my needs, and I believe that puts it under the APAP category. I also have the EPR setting which, as I understand, is supposed to mimic a bilevel. So, I guess I'm just wondering if I'm missing anything by using an Autoset vs. a true bilevel?
Post Reply Post Reply
#2
RE: Bilevel vs. Autoset
Your pressures are relatively low and as long as you're getting good AHI results and low RERA I wouldn't worry about bilevel.

EPR works a bit differently from a true bilevel. It does provide up to 3 cm of exhale pressure relief, but the timing and implementation are not equivalent to a true bilevel. With an auto-bilevel machine, the minimum EPAP is set first to prevent OA. Pressure support (PS) is added to achieve an IPAP that controls H, FL and RERA. Too much PS can washout CO2 and result in CA. So really, bilevel is very easy to titrate, extremely comfortable, and much better for those who require high pressures or don't tolerate CPAP.

Lets consider your pressure settings, (7-12) and what they really mean. With EPR of 3.0 your effective EPAP pressure is 4-9. If you were titrating with bilevel, could you really prevent OA at only 4 cmH2O pressure? The pressure support of bilevel is what really makes the difference as it makes inhalation so much easier that is overcomes flow limitation. For people with upper respiratory airway resistance this makes breathing effortless. The machine rapidly detects the end of inhalation and switches to the EPAP pressure which is high enough to prevent respiratory collapse, but comfortable for breathing out.

I guess APAP is similar, but the feel is very different. I get very good AHI results on APAP and have one that I use as a standby. I don't "need" bilevel although it cuts my OA and RERA significantly, by 2/3. Still doesn't probably qualify as medically necessary. If you had a chance to get one, I wouldn't turn it down as it is an improvement over CPAP, but you describe your machine as comfortable and effective, so why worry about it?
Sleeprider
Apnea Board Moderator
www.ApneaBoard.com

____________________________________________
Download OSCAR Software
Soft Cervical Collar
Optimizing Therapy
Organize your OSCAR Charts
Attaching Files
Mask Primer
How To Deal With Equipment Supplier


INFORMATION ON APNEA BOARD FORUMS OR ON APNEABOARD.COM SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED AS MEDICAL ADVICE. ALWAYS SEEK THE ADVICE OF A PHYSICIAN BEFORE SEEKING TREATMENT FOR MEDICAL CONDITIONS, INCLUDING SLEEP APNEA. INFORMATION POSTED ON THE APNEA BOARD WEB SITE AND FORUMS ARE PERSONAL OPINION ONLY AND NOT NECESSARILY A STATEMENT OF FACT.
Post Reply Post Reply
#3
RE: Bilevel vs. Autoset
(01-29-2016, 02:15 PM)Possum Wrote: How do you know if you need, or would benefit from using one?
People on higher pressure, hard to exhale against pressure, gas problems, pulmonary lung issues like COPD, can benefit from using bilevel

But for the majority with straight forward sleep apnea, CPAP/APAP is all that needed. I haven't seen any actual proof that bilevel is better than CPAP for this group of people. If something is better, has to produce better results, like improved sleep quality
Post Reply Post Reply
#4
RE: Bilevel vs. Autoset
Thanks for the thoughtful responses, zonk and Sleeprider. I'm not "worried" about my therapy - just wanted to make sure I'm not missing out on something even more awesome than what I'm already doing. Smile

Sometimes I do find exhalation difficult, but since I've been losing weight and my Autoset has been steadily decreasing my average treatment pressure, it's been easier.
Post Reply Post Reply
#5
RE: Bilevel vs. Autoset
Bi-level machines can also be auto-adjusting. You don't have to choose one over the other. Since you already have an auto-adjusting machine, if you stepped up to an auto-adjusting bi-level it would lower the pressure more than by just the 3 cm or so that your EPR gives you. Plus, there are other tweaks.
Sleepster

INFORMATION ON APNEA BOARD FORUMS OR ON APNEABOARD.COM SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED AS MEDICAL ADVICE. ALWAYS SEEK THE ADVICE OF A PHYSICIAN BEFORE SEEKING TREATMENT FOR MEDICAL CONDITIONS, INCLUDING SLEEP APNEA. INFORMATION POSTED ON THE APNEA BOARD WEB SITE AND FORUMS ARE PERSONAL OPINION ONLY AND NOT NECESSARILY A STATEMENT OF FACT.
Post Reply Post Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Need help with Airsense 10 AutoSet JonUK 2 105 03-25-2024, 06:11 PM
Last Post: JonUK
Question I'm back, tired, and hopeless. But is Bilevel the answer ?? weuw 83 4,958 03-23-2024, 08:16 AM
Last Post: Sleeprider
  Catathrenia +/- UARS: Bilevel or ASV or other? empiricismandstatistics 0 79 03-21-2024, 04:37 AM
Last Post: empiricismandstatistics
  UARS diagnosis? No improvements on CPAP. What Bilevel machine to get and where? empiricismandstatistics 8 198 03-21-2024, 04:29 AM
Last Post: empiricismandstatistics
  Sucking in on bilevel ahuman 9 174 03-19-2024, 09:00 AM
Last Post: ahuman
  Bilevel ASV - Resuming After Septoplaasty Dread 130 8,126 03-13-2024, 12:39 AM
Last Post: stevew168
  [Treatment] CPAP to Bilevel advice kkjacks 21 786 03-12-2024, 01:33 PM
Last Post: kkjacks


New Posts   Today's Posts


About Apnea Board

Apnea Board is an educational web site designed to empower Sleep Apnea patients.