Hello Guest, Welcome to Apnea Board !
As a guest, you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use.
To post a message, you must create a free account using a valid email address.

or Create an Account


New Posts   Today's Posts

[Diagnosis] Machine interpretations of events flawed?
#1
Machine interpretations of events flawed?
I've been looking at some of the events over the last several months and wondering how/why the machine flags some things and not other things.
I realize that some of these have "time" criteria (e.g. 10 seconds), or amplitude criteria, etc.  It seems to me that the machine can flag and "fix" obvious events, but some of the other things either should be events that are "fixed" by pressure pulse or increased pressure, or are not events at all and should not be counted as such in the stats.

Looking at last night's data I see some confusing stuff, maybe one of the experts on board here can help me understand. Am I missing something?

  -- Image 2 & 4 - The CA#001 and OA#003 flow rates look basically the same, the machine initiated a pressure pulse for the CA like it was supposed to, but since it interpreted the other waveform as an OA it didn't initiate one.

  -- Image 3 - Flow rate doesn't really look like anything other than slightly irregular breathing at the OA point (should it be FL?) and the FL looks like normal breathing.

  -- Image 5 - What is this? Just irregular breathing? The first jiggly part of the flow rate wave is flagged as VS2, the second jiggly part - nothing.


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
   
Post Reply Post Reply



Donate to Apnea Board  
#2
RE: Machine interpretations of events flawed?
Looks like the images got corrupted somehow...and I can't edit it or delete it for correction.

Post edited...Moderator

I've been looking at some of the events over the last several months and wondering how/why the machine flags some things and not other things.
I realize that some of these have "time" criteria (e.g. 10 seconds), or amplitude criteria, etc.  It seems to me that the machine can flag and "fix" obvious events, but some of the other things either should be events that are "fixed" by pressure pulse or increased pressure, or are not events at all and should not be counted as such in the stats.

Looking at last night's data I see some confusing stuff, maybe one of the experts on board here can help me understand. Am I missing something?

 -- Image 2 & 4 - The CA#001 and OA#003 flow rates look basically the same, the machine initiated a pressure pulse for the CA like it was supposed to, but since it interpreted the other waveform as an OA it didn't initiate one.

 -- Image 3 - Flow rate doesn't really look like anything other than slightly irregular breathing at the OA point (should it be FL?) and the FL looks like normal breathing.

 -- Image 5 - What is this? Just irregular breathing? The first jiggly part of the flow rate wave is flagged as VS2, the second jiggly part - nothing.
Post Reply Post Reply
#3
RE: Machine interpretations of events flawed?
Image 2: CA#001
   

Image 4: OA#003
   

Image 3: FL#006 & OA#002
   

Image 5: Not Flagged
   
Post Reply Post Reply
#4
RE: Machine interpretations of events flawed?
Most of your examples show moderate flow limitation. I agree that the OA flagged in image #3 is incorrect.

You need more minimum pressure, and if you had a Resmed, i would increase EPR. Flex is less reliable, but I would turn that on and set it to 1. This much flow limitation would respond nicely to pressure support, but since we have a Philips, well, it is what it is. I would change pressure to 9.0 to 14 Flex at 1, or possibly 9.5-14.
Post Reply Post Reply
#5
RE: Machine interpretations of events flawed?
I think it is best to view event flags as just definitions that correlate with breathing. No definition is perfect. The trend is what's important. Every event is calculated based on the prescribed criteria but that does not necessarily mean that all events are equivalent.
The nice thing about sleepyhead is that you can see every breath and assess whether it looks like "a series struggle for air and sleep" or "just a cough and roll-over".
Post Reply Post Reply



Donate to Apnea Board  
#6
RE: Machine interpretations of events flawed?
(06-20-2018, 09:41 PM)Sleeprider Wrote: Most of your examples show moderate flow limitation. I agree that the OA flagged in image #3 is incorrect.

You need more minimum pressure, and if you had a Resmed, i would increase EPR. Flex is less reliable, but I would turn that on and set it to 1.  This much flow limitation would respond nicely to pressure support, but since we have a Philips, well, it is what it is. I would change pressure to 9.0 to 14 Flex at 1, or possibly 9.5-14.

Thanks Sleeprider,

I've been working my way up with the min pressure and down with the max.  Started at standard prescription setting of 4 - 20. It's been at 8.5 - 14 for 21 days now.  Flex has been at 1 for quite awhile, 0, 2, & 3 just didn't work for me at all.  90% pressure has been around 10 - 10.2 for the last month or more.  Max pressure hasn't been above 14 ever, so I'll keep it dialed in there, min is moving up to 9.0 tonight.

I appreciate the help!
Post Reply Post Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Are "events per hour" on the MyAir App the same as AHI ? theMezz 119 6,972 10-16-2018, 11:45 AM
Last Post: theMezz
  Question about flow rate charts and events jminminnesota 15 588 10-06-2018, 06:06 PM
Last Post: sventory
  How to display CSR Events in SleepyHead UncollapseMeThroat 8 218 09-22-2018, 10:56 AM
Last Post: Sleeprider
  [CPAP] sudden jump in the number of events lech 3 191 09-20-2018, 08:25 AM
Last Post: horsepower
  Is my CPAP machine catching all my apnea events? fs12 19 861 08-25-2018, 10:01 PM
Last Post: fs12
Question AHI as related to stop breathing events Bruce1804 5 263 08-25-2018, 07:29 AM
Last Post: OpalRose
  Central events at altitude klmaish 9 341 08-14-2018, 12:22 PM
Last Post: Sleeprider


New Posts   Today's Posts




About Apnea Board

Apnea Board is an educational web site designed to empower Sleep Apnea patients.