(12-26-2019, 02:20 PM)123456 Wrote: Update: both the DME that shipped me the hose, and the one I originally got my machine from both say that the hose size does not make a difference. But logically it would seem that it should make a difference because the volume of air is different when the diameter is either increased or reduced.
No, logically, hose size wouldn't matter.
Because fundamentally, you don't have a CPAV (Continuous Positive Air VOLUME) machine, do you?
No, I think you have a CPAP (Cointinuous Positive Air PRESSURE) machine of some variety.
And you see, in a closed system, pressure doesn't doesn't care about volume. 12cm H2O is the same pressure in the 15 mm tube as it is in a 19 mm tube as it is in a 22 mm tube. Or even a 44 mm diameter tube, if such a thing existed.
That's why it doesn't matter. Your machine uses pressure sensors to monitor and manage therapy, not the volume of air flowing thorough it. And even if it were moniotoring volume as the determinant as to how much to pump, then that volume is only what you breathe in and what escapes through the vents, not what remains in the hose. It has nothing to do with the diameter of the hose in any real sense.
It may have a very very tiny momentary impact on how fast the blower has to spin up to a pressure, but it is of no real consequence in the real world where you live.
I once had a very wise man describe this phenomenon as PAII - Preoccupation About Inconsequential Increments. Getting distracted with stuff that just doesn't matter. Like driving your car at 64.9 or 65.1 miles an hour in a 65 MPH zone for an hour long trip. One is below and one above the speed limit. Nobody is going to get pulled over for driving 65.1 and you are not going to get to your deestination more than a couple of seconds sooner. 64.9 is not going to get you to your destination but a few seconds behind when you would had you been driving at the posted 65 limit. There is a difference, but no real practical difference between them.
So in this regard what the DMEs are telling you is functionally spot on.
There. I said it.
OMMOHY
Contrarian in Residence