Hello Guest, Welcome to Apnea Board !
As a guest, you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use.
To post a message, you must create a free account using a valid email address.

or Create an Account


New Posts   Today's Posts

[News] ResMed sues APEX Medical over device patents
#1
ResMed takes aim at APEX Medical over respiratory device patents

March 29, 2013 by Arezu Sarvestani

ResMed is "taking action" against APEX Medical in launching an infringement lawsuit over patents pertaining to respiratory masks and flow generators.

San Diego medical devices maker ResMed (NYSE:RMD) announced this week that it's going to "take action" to protect its respiratory patents, most recently by filing an infringement lawsuit against APEX Medical.

ResMed filed parallel actions with the the International Trade Commission and in U.S federal courts, alleging that a handful of APEX's products violate patents for respiratory devices and masks.

The news comes just weeks after ResMed changed hands from founder and former CEO Dr. Peter Farrell to his son Michael "Mick" Farrell, a transition that took effect at the start of March.

"For more than two decades, ResMed has generated significant advances in innovative products for sleep-disordered breathing therapy," global general counsel and chief administrative officer David Pendarvis said in prepared remarks. "We invest over a hundred million dollars in research and development each year to fuel these advances and other companies should not be allowed to infringe ResMed's intellectual property by using our technology."

ResMed specifically named 6 models among 3 of APEX's products as alleged violations: "The APEX WiZARD 210 and WiZARD 220 masks, the identical Freedom 210 and Freedom 220 masks made by APEX and sold by Medical Depot, the APEX iCH and XT Fit flow generators."

The California device maker is taking on APEX and its U.S. distributor, Medical Depot, according to a press release.

"ResMed is asking the ITC to stop the importation and sales of these products in the United States, and it is asking the U.S. federal court to stop the infringement and award damages against the defendants," according to the company.

fair use from:
http://www.massdevice.com/news/resmed-ta...ce-patents



Link to official ResMed press release:
http://investor.resmed.com/phoenix.zhtml...&highlight=
The above post may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. The material available is intended to advance the understanding of Sleep Apnea treatment and to advance the educational level of Sleep Apnea patients with regard to their health. Sometimes included is the full text of articles and documents rather than a simple link because outside links frequently "go bad" or change over time. This constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material in this post is distributed without fee or payment of any kind for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this post for purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use", you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Post Reply Post Reply
#2
I'd be more sympathetic to Resmed if they weren't ripping off patients outside the U.S. I might even speak up for them if they weren't deliberately encouraging the prescription requirement for their products, clearly designed to increase sales prices. And until they recognize that their customer is the patient, not the DME, they will get no support from me.
Post Reply Post Reply
#3
I agree JJJ. I think you'll find that almost all R&D money for medical equipment comes from taxpayers and not from the goodness of the CEO's heart. If R&D was funded by the company alone (as I think that man is trying to imply) there would be NO new tech developed at all because "It's too risky".

So I say: "PFFT!!!"



"With ordinary talent and extraordinary perseverance, all things are attainable." - Thomas Foxwell Buxton

Cool
Post Reply Post Reply


#4
I agree with most of what you say Shastzi, except the statement that there would be no new tech developements without all of the R&D subsidies. I think more investors would take risk if they had to; but, why should they learn to climb trees when there is so much low hanging fruit?

Actually; it would be more accurate to say: Why should they learn to climb trees when they can bribe the politicians to pass laws requiring tax payers to climb trees and throw the fruit down to them.
Post Reply Post Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  how long did it take to get your machine from the medical supply company? jasonarmstrong 14 478 11 hours ago
Last Post: SarcasticDave94
  CMS-50D+ "Device not recognized" jsielke 12 412 05-11-2017, 02:36 PM
Last Post: jsielke
  [Equipment] Is there a way to tell whether this anti snoring device is treating my sleep apnea? nico08 10 473 04-29-2017, 06:43 PM
Last Post: ajack
Question Anyone ever do business, with NorthStar medical specialists? Hockenberry 5 240 03-26-2017, 02:01 PM
Last Post: Hockenberry
  Placement of CPAP device TrailerSweetheart 21 1,050 03-06-2017, 12:53 AM
Last Post: Hydrangea
  [Equipment] New sleep apnea patient here using oral device for first time liz81 16 783 02-20-2017, 03:45 PM
Last Post: Hydrangea
  Apex xt auto - pressure set up janusz0127 3 335 02-04-2017, 03:52 PM
Last Post: trish6hundred

Forum Jump:

New Posts   Today's Posts




About Apnea Board

Apnea Board is an educational web site designed to empower Sleep Apnea patients.

For any more information, please use our contact form.