Hello Guest, Welcome to Apnea Board !
As a guest, you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use.
To post a message, you must create a free account using a valid email address.

or Create an Account

New Posts   Today's Posts

[News] Trucking: Why waiting for a sleep apnea regulation is a bad idea
Why waiting for a sleep apnea regulation is a bad idea

As awareness of sleep apnea increases, courts are increasingly siding with the plaintiffs in civil suits

By: James Menzies

PORTLAND, Ore. -- A much-anticipated regulation that will require carriers operating in the US to screen commercial drivers for sleep apnea could still be a year away.

Waiting for the law to be passed, however, is increasingly risky for motor carriers based on a number of recent court judgments. That was the assertion of Angela Cash, partner with US law firm Scopelitis, Garvin, Light, Hanson & Feary, when speaking during a recent Webinar on legal issues facing motor carriers, hosted by HR and compliance software provider Compli.

“We don’t have a regulation yet, but the case law that’s developing out there is already putting the liability on motor carriers even without a regulation from the FMCSA that would require companies to screen for obstructive sleep apnea,” Cash said.

Recent court cases involving commercial vehicle accidents that may have been related to fatigue have relied heavily on expert testimony, Cash pointed out. In one case a truck driver who was involved in an accident and then died of his injuries two weeks later was determined to have sleep apnea without ever having been diagnosed, based solely on the opinion of an expert who came to his conclusion based largely on the driver’s physical attributes.

Cash suggested there’s enough information currently available about sleep apnea and its risks that carriers are taking a chance by ignoring the issue.

“I think the tide is turning,” she said. “It’s not a situation where you can say ‘We don’t have a program,’ and those without a program are getting a free pass. There’s enough out there in terms of studies, data, expert testimony regarding the trucking industry and sleep apnea that a pretty persuasive case can be made to show your driver was a risk - a time bomb, if you will - behind the wheel.”

Launching a screening program for drivers is a good start, Cash suggested, but follow-through is equally important.

“Plaintiff councils love for motor carriers to put policies in place and then not follow them,” she warned. “If you have a program, make sure you cover the whole thing and that you’re not just identifying the drivers who might be at risk at the outset. But also, what are you doing to get them help, what are you requiring them to do in terms of treatment and what are you doing in terms of monitoring that treatment?”
Carriers also should be following up on minor crashes and driver complaints of fatigue to ensure they’re not indicative of an underlying medical issue such as obstructive sleep apnea.

One of the risks for carriers without a sleep apnea program is that many drivers who suffer from the condition are fairly easy to identify. It’s been well publicized that obesity, a thick neck, smoking and alcohol consumption are often prevalent among sleep apnea sufferers, meaning an expert witness or jury could draw their own conclusions based on a driver’s appearance.

“If you start looking at the picture of that driver it becomes very clear there’s an increased risk of sleep apnea,” Cash pointed out. “If that driver is involved in an accident where it appears sleep behind the wheel may have been an issue, all those factors are going to come out. The plaintiff council will say ‘I can see it, why couldn’t you see it motor carrier? You were there all along’.”

Only 18% of the fleets represented on the Webinar indicated in a poll that they currently screen drivers for sleep apnea. A US notice of proposed rulemaking could be forthcoming later this year, but Cash warned “There’s lots of information out there that motor carriers need to be looking at and asking themselves what they can do even before the regulations come into place.”

fair use from:

The above post may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. The material available is intended to advance the understanding of Sleep Apnea treatment and to advance the educational level of Sleep Apnea patients with regard to their health. Sometimes included is the full text of articles and documents rather than a simple link because outside links frequently "go bad" or change over time. This constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material in this post is distributed without fee or payment of any kind for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this post for purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use", you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Post Reply Post Reply

Donate to Apnea Board  

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  afib and sleep apnea poppypete 186 7,226 07-27-2018, 01:31 AM
Last Post: jmjm28
Wink Cpap =tinittus or central sleep apnea? Mouchet 7 248 07-22-2018, 08:08 AM
Last Post: Homerec130
  Positional Sleep Apnea Olive2018 4 192 07-17-2018, 10:12 AM
Last Post: mesenteria
  [Diagnosis] Diagnosed with Central Sleep Apnea apneabloke 8 328 07-16-2018, 07:18 AM
Last Post: foxfire
  Medical Marijuana and Sleep Apnea? BDP87 12 512 07-15-2018, 09:51 PM
Last Post: Mosquitobait
  Associated Press "New ways to conquer sleep apnea compete for place in bedroom" 2SleepBetta 0 281 07-12-2018, 05:30 PM
Last Post: 2SleepBetta
  Altitude-induced Sleep Apnea b.e.wilson 6 364 06-17-2018, 10:21 PM
Last Post: ShaunBlake

Forum Jump:

New Posts   Today's Posts

About Apnea Board

Apnea Board is an educational web site designed to empower Sleep Apnea patients.